Analisis Komparatif Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia dan Finlandia

Authors

  • Salman Al Farisy Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Nathasya Fitria prodi ilmu pemerintahan universitas syiah kuala
  • Garin Wulan Raja Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Nurul Kamaly prodi ilmu pemerintahan universitas syiah kuala https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9772-8756
  • Afrijal Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Ibnu Program Studi Sosiologi, Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56921/jumper.v5i2.406

Keywords:

Education Policy, Curriculum, Education Governance, Teacher Autonomy, Education Reform

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparative education policies of Indonesia and Finland, focusing on curriculum, teacher autonomy, educational equity, and evaluation systems, and their implications for national education reform. This research uses a qualitative approach with a comparative study method through a review of academic literature. The results indicate that fundamental differences between the two countries lie not only in policy design but also in the paradigm of educational governance. Indonesia tends to adopt a control-based governance approach characterized by reactive curriculum changes, a predominance of standards-based evaluations, and a high administrative burden on teachers. In contrast, Finland implements trust-based governance, emphasizing policy stability, teacher professional autonomy, equity-based equity, and formative evaluation oriented toward student development. These findings reveal a mismatch between Indonesia's educational goals, which focus on developing competencies and character, and policy instruments that are still based on control and standardization. As a contribution, this study offers a hybrid governance model framework that integrates policy accountability with strengthening trust in teacher professionalism. Policy implications include long-term curriculum simplification, reducing teacher administrative burdens, strengthening area-based interventions for educational equity, and transforming the evaluation system toward diagnostic and formative assessments.

References

Adha, M. M., et al. (2019). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan di Indonesia dalam perspektif desentralisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(2), 123–135.

Ananda, R., et al. (2023). Transformasi kebijakan pendidikan dalam meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional, 12(1), 45–58.

Annur, C. M., et al. (2024). Tantangan implementasi kurikulum dalam sistem pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 89–102.

Aprila, D. (2025). Fleksibilitas kurikulum dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran di Finlandia. Jurnal Pendidikan Global, 5(1), 33–47.

Asmara, R., & Raflesia, D. (2023). Pendidikan terbaik di dunia. Penerbit Edukasi Nusantara.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Defining teaching quality around the world. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919080

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Fitria, N. (2024). Profesionalisme guru dalam sistem pendidikan Finlandia. Jurnal Pendidikan Internasional, 8(1), 55–68.

Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2020). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin Press.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

Hailitik, R. (2024). Keunggulan sistem pendidikan Finlandia dalam perspektif global. Jurnal Pendidikan Komparatif, 7(1), 21–34.

Halinen, I., Harmanen, M., & Mattila, P. (2021). Finland’s curriculum reform and the development of transversal competencies. European Journal of Education, 56(3), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12465

Hargreaves, A. (2021). What the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us about teachers and teaching. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20(3), 183–187.

Hatip, A., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Analisis data kualitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2), 67–78.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muryanti, & Herman. (2021). Perbandingan sistem pendidikan Indonesia dan Finlandia. Jurnal Pendidikan Komparatif, 4(2), 101–115.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en

OECD. (2021). Education policy outlook 2021: Shaping responsive and resilient education in a changing world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/75e40a16-en

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

Sahlberg, P. (2020). Will the pandemic change schools? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3–4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0026

Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

Schleicher, A. (2020). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.

Schleicher, A. (2023). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Non-state actors in education. UNESCO Publishing.

Wijaya, A., & Samsirin. (2023). Evaluasi kebijakan pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 77–90.

World Bank. (2021). The state of the global education crisis: A path to recovery. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1779-6

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Al Farisy, S., Fitria, N., Wulan Raja, G., Kamaly, N., Afrijal, & Ibnu. (2026). Analisis Komparatif Kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia dan Finlandia. JUMPER: Journal of Educational Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.56921/jumper.v5i2.406