ENGLISH

Authors

  • Muhammad Nasir UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56921/cpkm.v2i2.136

Keywords:

Historical writing; historiography; tambo; Minangkabau; reconciliative history

Abstract

The process of writing Tambo Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur, which contains information on the history of the nagari, is a reflection of a complex society, including episodes of the journey of conflict that have garnered their memories for some time. In an effort to reconcile the turbulent past, the model of reconciling historical writing can be used as an alternative approach. This paper is a reflection model of the implementation of participatory activities in the preparation of Tambo Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur, a work of local history using focus group discussion methods, content analysis and in-depth interviews. The results show that community involvement in the drafting process has succeeded in presenting local perspectives by using balanced narratives, inclusive approaches, and in-depth understanding sourced from Minangkabau local wisdom. The model of reconciling historical writing, as seen in Tambo Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur, can be considered as a development of contemporary Minangkabau historiography.

References

Eilks, Ingo and Silvija Markic. (2011). Effects of a Long-Term Participatory Action Research Project on Science Teachers’ Professional Development, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(3), 149-160, DOI: http://10.12973/ejmste/75196

Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. Curriculum Perspectives, 2, 23-34.

Hasanadi, (2018). Kearifan Lokal dalam Ungkapan Tradisional: Membaca Ulang Karakteristik Masyarakat Pasaman

Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah dan Budaya, Vol. 4 No. 1, Juni 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36424/jpsb.v4i1.100

Hashim, Mohd Nor Hanisah and Hashim, Nur Idzhainee and Mohd Padzil, Amira Syuhada and Mohd Nasir, Nurul Akmaniza (2022) Knowledge, Attitudes and Pratices (KAP) survey model for solid waste management in public park / Nurul Akmaniza Mohd Nasir ... [et al.]. Epitome of Nature (EON) (5). pp. 46-49. ISSN 2773-5869

Katoppo, ML., et al. (2020). Preserving local wisdom on water conservation through video documentary (case studies: Mekar Bakti Village, Panongan Regency, Tangerang), IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 452 012066

Visser, Sanne Siete & Diana Kreemers (2020). Breaking through boundaries with PAR or not? Educational Action Research, 28: 3, 345-361, DOI: http://10.1080/09650792.2019.1624380

Warto (2017). Tantangan Penulisan Sejarah Lokal. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, Vol 11, No 1

Wong, Kwong Hui, Hui Wei Ho. (2021). A Rapid Rural Appraisal of a Remote Village in Lahad Datu, Sabah, BJMS: Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences, 15 (2) May, 2021: 35 – 45

Z,A., Sari, F. M., & Prihati. (2021). Pemulihan Ekonomi Melalui Pembangunan Kebun Bibit Desa Menggunakan Metode Participatory Action Research (PAR). Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 356-364. https://doi.org/10.31849/dinamisia.v5i2.5351

Dirajo, Ibrahim, Dt. Sanggono. (1919). Cuaraian Adat Alam Minangkabau. Bukittinggi: Fort De Kock

Dt. Batuah, Ahmad & A. Dt. Madjoindo.(1956). Tambo Minangkabau dan Adatnja. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Hakimy, Idrus. (1978). Rangkaian Mustika Adat Basandi Syarak di Minangkabau. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Kartodirdjo, S. (1992). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kuntowijoyo. (2003). Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

M.D. Mansoer, A. I. (1970). Sedjarah Minangkabau. Jakarta: Bhratara.Mangkudun, S. Y.

. Menggugat Pemahaman Tambo Minangkabau: Sepuluh Kesalahan Pemahaman Tambo Minangkabau. Padang: Erka.

Myers, D. G. (2012). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Nasroen. (1957). Dasar Falsafah Adat Minangkabau. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Rangkoto, N. (2011). Pantun Adat Minangkabau. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional RI.

S.E. Taylor, L. P. (2009). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Saydam, G. (2004). Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Minang: Minang-Indonesia, Indonesia-Minang. Padang: Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Minangkabau.

Yaldison. (2016). Profil Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur. Solok Selatan: Pemenrintah Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur.

Nasir, M. (2019, December Friday). https://bakaba.co/penulisan-tambo-nagari/. Retrieved from https://bakaba.co: https://bakaba.co/penulisan-tambo-nagari/

Darwis Dt. Bandaro Putiah, Penghulu Suku Bendang, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

Darlis Dt. Rajo Magek, Penghulu Suku Panai, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

Jamroni Dt. Malintang Bumi, Ketua Kerapatan Adat Nagari (KAN) Pakan Rabaa, Kecamatan Koto Parik Gadang Diateh

Jamuhur Dt. Pagulu Sati, Penghulu Suku Malayu, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

Atra Y Suprion Dt. Sutan Sati, Penghulu Suku Caniago, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

Safrizal Dt. Sampono Bumi, Penghulu Suku Kutiayian, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

Saiful Dt. Rajo Intan, Tokoh Masyarakat Pinti Kayu Gadang, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur, Kecamatan Koto Parik Gadang Diateh

Salman Dt. Rangkayo Basa, Penghulu Suku Malayu

Maiyon Efendi Dt. Panghulu Kayo, Penghulu Suku Tanjuang, Nagari Pakan Rabaa Timur

Marsadis Dt. Sutan Mamad, Tokoh Adat Alam Surambi Sungai Pagu, Kabupaten Solok Selatan

Mestika Zed, Sejarawan Universitas Negeri Padang

Nasril, Walinagari Pakan Rabaa Timur, Kecamatan Koto Parik Gadang Diateh

Sehiful Yazan, Akademisi UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Peneliti Tambo Minangkabau

Yulizal Yunus Dt. Rajo Bagindo, Akademisi, Ahli Adat Minangkabau, Pengurus LKAAM Sumatera Barat

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Nasir, M. (2023). ENGLISH. Catimore: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.56921/cpkm.v2i2.136